Illiteracy's Proven Solution - Vital Questions About Widespread English Functional Illiteracy

Unless you have read Jonathan Kozol's 1985 book,known. The second mistake in illiteracy coverage in the
Illiterate America or you have carefully analyzed thepress is that it is far too often only concerned with
most comprehensive, statistically accurate study ofboring stories of an occasional adult illiterate who can
U.S. adult illiteracy ever commissioned by the U.S.now read thanks to the efforts of some selfless
government, a five-year, $14 million study involvingvolunteer. This type of coverage too often lulls the
lengthy interviews of 26,049 U.S. adults, statisticallypublic into believing that is all there is to the problem of
balanced for age, gender, ethnicity, and location (urban,adult illiteracy.
suburban, and rural in a dozen states across the U.S.- A big part of the reason people do not realize the
and in several prisons) to represent the entire U.S.seriousness of the literacy problem is the way the
population, you undoubtedly do not realize themedia handles the reporting of scientific or statistical
seriousness of the problem. Illiterates have developedstudies. Since reporters are journalists, not statisticians
numerous coping methods that make them very goodor mathematicians, and since the reporters are almost
at hiding their illiteracy. Several of your acquaintancesalways under time pressures to get their report out
may be -- unknown to you -- functionally illiterate.(before someone else reports it and it is no longer
A front page report in the New York Times on"news"), reporters often read only the Executive
September 9, 1993 and a shorter article in theSummary of lengthy reports. In any case, journalists
Washington Post on the same date, the day ofseldom do a careful study of the entire report, much
release of the above-mentioned study, listed some ofless a serious mathematical analysis of data in a study.
the details of the report, but did not mention the mostThe 1993 study mentioned above was a 150 page
serious problems found in the body of the report.report. The April 2002 version of the report was even
These reports were evidently based upon the shortlonger: 199 pages. In the case of this study, a simple
"Executive Summary" of the report. Even though amathematical analysis of the data was required to
follow-up report issued in 2006 showed no statisticallyunderstand the true seriousness of the findings of the
significant improvement, there have been no otherstudy.
known references to this report in any known media- The New York Times article about the 1993 study
source. Jonathan Kozol, in Illiterate America, explainedgave an explanation of why increasing our literacy rate
why the official U.S. Census Bureau reports on literacyis important: "The overall education level of Americans
rate are inaccurate and explains that it is in thehas increased in terms of schooling and even in
short-term best interests of political and educationalfundamental literacy. But the demands of the
authorities to downplay the seriousness of the Englishworkplace simultaneously have vastly increased. We
literacy problem.simply are not keeping pace with the kinds of skills
It is in your best interest, however, to understand therequired in today's economy." The article also gave an
seriousness of the problem and to take actionexplanation of why literacy is a problem for so many
because illiteracy has human suffering costs for thepeople: "Insufficient education and a growing number of
illiterates (at least 34 types of serious physical, mental,adults whose first language is not English were
emotional, medical, and financial problems that weimportant reasons that the scores were so low." They
would consider catastrophes if they happened to us)failed to mention, however, that the interviewees were
and monetary costs for every American: (1) for thecarefully chosen to be an accurate representation of
cost of government programs that illiterates use (fromthe entire U.S. population at the time of the study, so
our taxes) and for the cost of truancy, juvenilethe amount of education and the number of persons
delinquency, and crime directly related to illiteracy, andwhose first language is not English was evenly
(2) for the increased cost of consumer goods as abalanced in the five literacy groupings. The article also
result of functional illiterates in the workplace.misquoted the study as saying it indicated that there
How does functional illiteracy cause serious problemswere 40 to 44 million adults in Level 1 literacy (the
for illiterates?lowest literacy level), "an 40 million" [sic] in Level 2, 61
Here are four brief examples. Janitors have been firedmillion in Level 3, 11 million in Level 4, and "up to 40
because they cannot read an after-hours note withmillion" in Level 5. Page 17 of the 2002 version of the
special clean-up instructions. Families have beenstudy shows the true figures to be, Level 1: 42.0 million
evicted from their apartment -- even in the coldest(22.0% of the 191 million U.S. adults in 1993), Level 2:
part of winter -- when the apartment owner (who50.9 million (26.7%), Level 3: 60.5 million (31.7%), Level 4:
wants to raise the rent, but knows the present renters31.2 million (16.3%), and Level 5: 6.4 million (3.3%). The
cannot afford the higher rent) falsely claimed that themost serious failing of the article is that it did not
rental contract allows eviction if a crying baby disturbsquantify the seriousness of the literacy problem. It
other tenants; evicted tenants who cannot read themerely began the article by stating: "Nearly half of the
contract will not challenge the apartment owner fearingnation's 191 million adult citizens are not proficient
their illiteracy will be exposed. The taking of medicinesenough in English to write a letter about a billing error or
poses a danger to those who cannot read theto calculate the length of a bus trip from a published
instructions on the medicine bottles. Children who haveschedule."
medical emergencies, such as asthma, are in grave- The article by the Washington Post writer began the
danger if the illiterate parents become lost becausearticle by stating: "Nearly half of all adult Americans
they cannot read the street signs; even if they haveread and write so poorly that it is difficult for them to
cell-phones they cannot tell the 911 operator theirhold a decent job, according to the most
location when they visit a remote place if they cannotcomprehensive literacy study ever done by the U.S.
describe their location sufficiently to allow ambulancegovernment." This raised questions of what constitutes
personnel to find them.a "decent job," exactly how many people are
These and hundreds of similar "horror stories" occur allaffected, how accurate was the study, and what
around us every day -- most of them without ourwere the statistical procedures to ensure accuracy,
knowledge because functional illiterates are extremelyleading to the author's "engineering study" of the report.
good at hiding their illiteracy. About half of adultIt was found that although the Washington Post
Americans are now functionally illiterate and mustwriter's statement was true, in effect it minimized the
constantly endure permanent shame, anger, andseriousness of the problem.
despair, unable to lift themselves out of privation.Illiterates Are Exceptionally Good At Hiding. The
Although nearly every American can at least read anumber of U.S. adults who cannot read at all is very
few words, if someone can only read 1200 to 1500small. But if they only know 1200-1600 simple words
simple words they learned by sight, they arethey learned by sight in the first four grades in school,
functionally illiterate. They cannot get by in our complexthey are functionally illiterate. They can't read and write
society as well as they should and must constantlywell enough to hold an above-poverty-level-wage job.
endure at least thirty-four different kinds of seriousThey have developed many coping skills for their
physical, mental, emotional, medical, and financialinability to read over the years. Chances are very
problems. Many simple tasks we take for granted aregood that many of your acquaintances are functional
impossible for illiterates. See Jonathan Kozol's 1985illiterates. They may be very knowledgeable. They
book, Illiterate America.may even be eloquent speakers. They just didn't get
America's Dirty Little Secret: How many Americanstheir knowledge or eloquence from reading.
are now functionally illiterate?Grade-Level Completion Does not equal Grade-Level
The National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES)Competence. Many people assume that after several
reported in 2006 that 44% of adults in the study wereyears of school the students know how to read.
in the two lowest of four reading levels (below basicEvery teacher knows, however -- even though they
and basic) and that 51% of those in the below basicmay be in denial of the fact -- that this is not
level had given up looking for a job and 5% werenecessarily true. Having sat out several years of
unemployed, looking for work. The percentages ofschooling does not guarantee an outcome. The
employed adults increased with each increase instudents may not know even a small fraction of what
reading ability. The 2006 report was a follow-up to thethey have been "taught."
much more thorough 1993 NCES report, the mostIlliterates Are a Silent Minority. Out of embarrassment,
extensive study of illiteracy ever commissioned by theilliterates are a silent minority. Community and cultural
U.S. government. Employment statistics from the 1993leaders of groups with a large number of illiterates do
report were about the same as the 2006 report.not want that fact publicized. They fear it will give their
The 1993 study used five literacy levels instead of four"enemies" (racists and class-conscious persons)
as in the 2006 report and revealed severalammunition against those who cannot read.
devastating facts about functional illiteracy that are notSelf-Esteem Teaching in School Is Very Effective.
covered in the 2006 report. Most people don't knowPerhaps today's most successful teaching in U.S.
these facts; there is no known reference to theseelementary schools is the teaching of self-esteem.
facts in any national media.Studies have shown that U.S. students often
The shocking NCES 1993 report titled "Adult Literacy inover-estimate their scholastic abilities. The U.S. scored
America," shows that the average yearly earningsworse than all but two nations in a recent math and
were: Level 1 (least literate), $2105; Level 2, $5225;science competition with about twenty other nations.
Level 3, $9090, and Levels 4 and 5 combined, $16,311.Some of the U.S. students in that competition bragged
The threshold poverty level for an individual in 1993that they were "good at math." Some of them were
was $7363 per year. (See the U.S. Census Bureau'snot only not "good at math," they may also have had
Threshold Poverty report for 1993) Shockingly, 22.0difficulty reading their math books.
percent of U.S. adults were Level 1 and 26.7 percentThe U.S. Census Reports Greatly Over-Estimate
were Level 2. This means 48.7 percent of U.S. adultsLiteracy. Many believe the U.S. is a highly literate nation
had average annual earnings significantly below thebecause of census statistics. The last two or three
poverty level largely because of their functionalcensus reports claimed a U.S. literacy rate of 99%. It is
illiteracy.in the short-term interest of politicians and education
We do not see 48 percent or more of U.S. adults inofficials to believe these figures. This is not to say that
poverty because most households have more thanthere was necessarily any conscious deception.
one employed adult and because low-incomeJonathan Kozol's shocking book, Illiterate America,
households receive governmental assistance (from ourpages 37-38, explained how these figures were
taxes) and from family, friends, and charities. Even so,decided upon. Once we understand how the census
the 1993 NCES report showed that 31.2 percent of thebureau did the studies, we will be likely to agree with
adults in the two lowest literacy levels were in povertyJonathan Kozol. He thought the accuracy of the
(the report only showed poverty in each literacy level,census reports was open to serious doubt. The "Adult
but the combination of levels 1 and 2 can be easilyLiteracy in America study," in fact, proves the census
calculated).bureau figures on literacy rate are wrong.
Although the 1993 NCES report did not show theSensory Overload. We are constantly bombarded
combined poverty rate for literacy levels 3 through 5, itwith information, much of it bad news. The world
is easily calculated to be 10.1 percent. Since there areseems to go on with little effect despite the bad news
no provable differences in the interviewees exceptabout literacy. We soon learn to ignore much of it. This
their literacy rates, this is a strong indication that aboutis because we often do not want to believe it.
twice as many (deducting 10.1 percent which is not dueSometimes we have seen a later report denying the
to illiteracy from the 31.2 percent total and comparingvalidity of the bad news. After a few years we have
the resulting 21.1 percent to the 10.1 percent) U.S. adultsforgotten most of the bad news, even if we initially
are in poverty because of their literacy level as for allthought it was significant.
other reasons combined.We Do Not See Large Portions of Our Population in
How Will YOU Benefit From Ending Illiteracy?Poverty. In most cases, more than one family member
- You will benefit emotionally if you are concerned thatis employed. If all workers in the family are functionally
people you know and love are -- or will beilliterate, the family may be at or below the poverty line.
--functionally illiterate. The problems and suffering ofIf one or more of the workers in the family are literate,
illiterates is almost certainly much worse than youthey bring the family above the poverty line.
realize. Many people you know are -- unknown to youWhat is the obvious solution to English functional
-- functionally illiterate.illiteracy?
- You will benefit if you object to the average personalThe obvious solution is to return English to the principle
cost to U.S. adults of $5186 each year as a result ofupon which an alphabetic language should be based --
illiteracy for (1) taxes for government programs thatspelling words as they sound, the way 98 percent of
illiterates use and for the truancy, juvenile delinquency,all alphabetic languages other than English does! All
and crime directly related to illiteracy, and (2) higherother attempts at improving the English literacy rate --
prices for consumer goods due to illiterates in thesuch as new reading books, better teacher training,
workplace.and similar changes -- are nothing more than fighting
- You will benefit if you are employed or if you havethe symptoms of the problem, similar to taking aspirin
financial interests in a business or organization in whichto combat the symptoms of pneumonia rather than
you invest time or money. Illiteracy affects alltaking penicillin to cure it. It is natural to resist change --
organizations to some extent, some of them seriously.even change for the better! People often prefer the
Illiteracy cuts the potential customers for writtendisadvantages of the familiar to the advantages of the
materials almost in half and hurts businesses andunfamiliar. But when a person researches and finds
organizations because of competition with morethat absolutely nothing done in American public schools
literate workers in foreign companies. The monthly U.S.in the last eighty years has made any statistically
trade deficit has grown steadily worse for manysignificant improvement in our true literacy rate (as
years.opposed to the optimistic assessments of politicians
- You will benefit if our nation improves the tradeand educational leaders who have a vested interest in
balance, national relationships, and our nationalreporting our literacy level as being higher than it really
employment by improving communication betweenis) and honestly examines the ease of learning possible
nations. Over 1.3 billion people worldwide speak Englishwith a spelling system that is extremely easy to learn
-- more than the dialect of any other language. Many(as opposed to the present illogical, inconsistent, and
of them use English to communicate with those whochaotic English spelling), common sense is certain to
do not speak their native language, but hundreds ofcause people honestly to evaluate this spelling reform
millions of people who speak English cannot read itproposal.
very well.If words are spelled phonetically, students only need to
What is the primary cause of English illiteracy?learn the spelling of 38 sounds instead of all 20,000 or
Most people are not functional illiterates because ofmore words in their reading vocabulary. Many people
any failing of their own but because of a defect in thehave a reading vocabulary of more than 70,000
English language. In 1755 an English dictionary waswords. If the phonetic spelling system is a perfect
prepared by Dr. Samuel Johnson. Linguists will tell youone-spelling-for-one-sound system, present readers
that Dr. Johnson made a very serious linguistic error incan learn it in ten minutes or less.
his dictionary. Instead of freezing the spelling of theThe use of perfectly phonetic spelling will enable
sounds of the English language, as linguistic logicbeginning students to learn to fluently read and write in
demands of an alphabetic language, Dr. Johnson frozeless than three months -- perhaps much less. Frank
the spelling of words. In effect, English words are nowLaubach, founder of Laubach Literacy International,
logograms -- certain letters, in a certain order, combinetaught thousands of adults to read in over 300
to represent a word, in the same way that strokes oflanguages around the world. Laubach found that he
various kinds combine to represent a Chinesecould teach students to read fluently in from one to
character or word. Present day English is atwenty days in some languages and in less than three
conglomeration of the words -- and their spelling --months in 98 percent of these languages. Laubach
from eight languages, the language of every conquerorstated that if English were spelled phonetically, students
who occupied the British Isles prior to 1755. Since thatcould learn to read in one week! Adoption of perfectly
time, English has adopted words -- and usually theirphonetic spelling will enable hundreds of millions of
spelling -- from about 350 other languages. See Henrypeople around the world who speak English but cannot
Hitching's book The Secret Life of Words.read it very well -- over 93 million in the U.S. alone -- to
The pronunciation of words changes with time, sobe able to read English who otherwise never would.
what was bad in 1755 is even worse today. ProfessorHow do we know that spelling reform can cure English
Julius Nyikos of Washington and Jefferson Collegeilliteracy?
found that there are at least 1768 ways of spellingConsider these facts about spelling reform:
forty sounds in English. See The Fourteenth LACUS- Dozens of scholars for over 250 years have
Forum 1987, published by Linguistic Association ofrecommended spelling reform. For over a hundred
Canada and the United States, P.O. Box 101, Lake Bluff,years there have been simplified spelling societies in
Illinois in 1988. There is not even one invariable spellingthe U.K. and U.S. by various names. The present
rule in English -- some of the exceptions havenames are The Spelling Society in the U.K. and
exceptions! The eyes of fluent readers skip easilyAmerican Literacy Council in the U.S. Both
over a multitude of traps for the beginner. As a result,organizations have very informative websites,
every word in a person's vocabulary must be learned,spellingsociety and americanliteracy, .org and .com,
one at a time, either by rote memory or by repeatedrespectively.
use.- Several nations, smaller and larger than the U.S., both
Why didn't YOU know the seriousness of theadvanced and third-world, have simplified their spelling.
functional illiteracy problem?- A simpler spelling system has been proven effective
- You May Not Have Seen the Report or It Was Notfor making learning to read easier in more than 300
Covered. The results of even important and extensivealphabetic languages but never tried in English. In 295
studies of literacy do not appear in all of the media forlanguages (at least 98% of them) students became
these reasons. (a) The literacy study may not befluent readers in less than three months. Most of the
covered if there are too many "more important"52.2 percent of U.S. adults who presently become
stories to be covered. By the time all the morefunctionally literate require two to four years.
important stories have been covered, the results of- All reasonable objections to spelling reform have
the study are no longer "news." (b) Some mediabeen thoroughly debunked by distinguished linguists and
executives have their reporters cover studies showingeducators. To see a very scholarly debunking of
results they disagree with. Many will not; and (c) mediaobjections to spelling reform from 1909 (!) -- at a time
executives are sometimes afraid that reportingwhen the need was not nearly as great as it is today
unfavorable results from a study will alienate themand when the changeover to a logical spelling system
from groups from whom they desire support.would have been much more difficult, without our
Obviously not all studies fit all three items. As a result,present computer programs and printing capabilities --
literacy and learning to read may -- for example -- besee the last chapter of English Spelling and Spelling
front page newspaper stories in some newspapers. ItReform by Thomas Lounsbury, LL.D, L.H.D, professor
may be totally ignored in others.emeritus of Yale University. This is a book ready to
- You May Have Seen a Report, But the Way It Wasread or download at the Internet Archive website.
Written Hid the Seriousness of the Problem.- The need is greater than ever in our increasingly
- Anne C. Lewis, a freelance writer on educationcomplex world. Although spelling reform is easier than
concerns, says there are "two big problems" the pressever due to computer technology, it has never been
makes in its coverage of illiteracy. The first mistake istried in English. Rudolph Flesch stated in Why Johnny
confusing adult illiteracy problems with problems in theCan't Read, pages 76-77 (this book is available for
public schools. It is typical to blame the adult literacyfree reading or download from the Internet Archive
problems on the schools and then go no further -- as ifwebsite),
fixing the blame will somehow result in solving theGenerally speaking, students in our schools are about
problem. Blaming the schools accomplishes nothingtwo years behind students of the same age in other
because, she pointed out, roughly 70 percent of thecountries. This is not a wild accusation of the American
workforce in the year 2000 was already in theeducation system; it is an established, generally known
workforce and therefore permanently out of publicfact....
schools. Furthermore, she says, thirty million or moreUsually the assumption seems to be that in other
Americans read so poorly they could "bring the wholecountries children and adolescents are forced to study
economy crashing down. With the rapidly acceleratingharder ... I think the explanation is much simpler and
technology in the workplace and its demands, formore reasonable: Americans take two years longer to
example, for reading the operating manuals and forlearn how to read -- and reading, of course, is the
retraining, previous levels of illiteracy are no longerbasis for achievement in all other subjects.
acceptable. She says the press rarely makes this