Personal Injury - Pre-Existing Conditions - What You Must Know

"Should I tell them about my pre-existing condition?"plaintiff rule" in reference to an early English case
"Will it hurt my case?" are questions injury clients oftenwhere a man with a thin skull suffered death when a
ask.normal man would have only suffered a bump on the
You don't want to hide anything about your medicalhead.
history from the other side. First, you have an obligationAsymptomatic Versus Symptomatic Condition
to share the information. Second, a preexistingThe rule is applied differently depending on whether,
condition that is aggravated can mean morebefore the accident, the victim was "asymptomatic," i.e.
compensation than if you were completely healthyno symptoms, or "symptomatic" i.e. having symptoms.
before the accident.Here is a summary of the majority American rule on
Take the case of Shannon whose car was struckaggravation of asymptomatic pre-existing conditions
from behind while sitting in traffic. There was no visibleas expressed by the Utah Court of Appeals:
damage to her Toyota Supra. Ordinarily a low"the rule is well settled that when a defendant's
property damage case like this one would not benegligence aggravates or lights up a latent, dormant or
worth much.asymptomatic condition, or one to which the injured
However, she began to feel pain in her neck right afterperson is predisposed, the defendant is liable to the
the accident and was taken to the emergency room.injured person for the full amount of damages which
A CT scan revealed that a preexisting disc injury hadensue, notwithstanding such diseased or weakened
been aggravated. Eventually Shannon required surgery.condition."
When Shannon's lawyer presented a claim to theFor symptomatic conditions the rule is slightly different.
at-fault driver's insurance company they made noPain or disability may have been present before the
offer at all. This is often the case in accidents with noaccident but the new accident makes it worse. In that
visible car damage.case the tortfeasor is only responsible to pay the
After a lawsuit was filed and a trial date was set thevictim compensation for the aggravation or worsening
insurance company settled the case for a significantof the condition. In these cases it is necessary to
amount.apportion between the preexisting condition and the
The Rule On Aggravation Of Pre-existing Conditionsworsening caused by the new accident.
In all 50 states it is established that a tortfeasor (i.e. theWorkers Compensation
person-at-fault, also known as the defendant) is liableThese rules also apply to workers compensation
when he aggravates a preexisting condition of thecases. The rule is well established that when an
plaintiff (i.e. the injured person, the person who files theindustrial accident lights up or aggravates a pre-existing
lawsuit).deficiency or disease, the aggravation is compensable
The United States Supreme Court gave approval toas long as the industrial accident was the medical and
this principle in United States v. Feola (420 U.S. 671,legal cause of the injury.
685.) In the Feola case the person-at-fault assaulted aConclusion
plain clothes federal police officer. He tried to reduceKnowledge of the law of pre-existing conditions is a
his liability by arguing that he did not know the man"must know" area for anyone handling an injury case.
was a federal officer.Be sure to research and understand the principles as
The Supreme Court did not care. It was irrelevant, saidthey apply in your state.
the Court, that the assailant did not know the victimDisclaimer
was an officer. In summary, said the Justices, citing aThis article is provided for informational purposes only
well-established principle of American law, a tortfeasorand is not intended to take the place of competent
"takes his victim as he finds him." (In this case thelegal advice from an experienced injury attorney in the
pre-existing condition was being a federal officer.)state where you live.
This principle is often referred to as the "eggshell