Personal Injury: Pre-existing Conditions--What You Must Know

0;Should I tell them about my pre-existing“eggshell plaintiff rule” in reference to an
condition?” “Will it hurt my case?”early English case where a man with a thin skull
are questions clients often ask.suffered death when a normal man would have only
You don’t want to hide anything about yoursuffered a bump on the head.
medical history from the other side. First, you have anAsymptomatic Versus Symptomatic Condition
obligation to share the information. Second, aThe rule is applied differently depending on whether,
preexisting condition that is aggravated can meanbefore the accident, the victim was "asymptomatic," i.e.
more compensation than if you were completelyno symptoms or "symptomatic" i.e. having symptoms.
healthy before the accident.Here is a summary of the majority American rule on
Take the case of Shannon whose car was struckaggravation of asymptomatic pre-existing conditions
from behind while sitting in traffic. There was no visibleas expressed by the Utah Court of Appeals:
damage to her Toyota Supra. Ordinarily a low"the rule is well settled that when a defendant's
property damage case like this one would not benegligence aggravates or lights up a latent, dormant or
worth much.asymptomatic condition, or one to which the injured
However, she began to feel pain in her neck right afterperson is predisposed, the defendant is liable to the
the accident and was taken to the emergency room.injured person for the full amount of damages which
A CT scan revealed that a preexisting disc injury hadensue, notwithstanding such diseased or weakened
been aggravated. Eventually Shannon required surgery.condition."
When I presented a claim to the at-faultThe other situation involves a preexisting condition
driver’s insurance they made no offer at all.where pain or disability is present before the new
This is often the case in accidents with no visible carinjury worsens it. In that case the tortfeasor is only
damage.responsible to pay the victim compensation for the
After a lawsuit was filed and a trial date was set theaggravation of the condition.
insurance company settled the case for a significantIn these cases it is necessary to apportion between
amount.the preexisting condition and the worsening caused by
The Rule On Aggravation Of Pre-existing Conditionsthe new accident.
In all 50 states it is established that a tortfeasor (i.e. theWorkers Compensation
person-at-fault, also known as the defendant) is liableThe rule is well established that when an industrial
when he aggravates a preexisting condition of theaccident lights up or aggravates a pre-existing
plaintiff (i.e. the injured person, the person who files thedeficiency or disease, it is compensable as long as the
lawsuit).industrial accident was the medical and legal cause of
The United States Supreme Court gave approval tothe injury.
this principle in United States v. Feola (420 U.S. 671,Conclusion
685.) In the Feola case the person-at-fault assaulted aKnowledge of the law of pre-existing conditions is a
plain clothes federal police officer. He tried to reduce"must know" area for anyone handling an injury case.
his liability by arguing that he did not know the manBe sure to research and understand the principles as
was a federal officer.they apply in your state.
The Supreme Court did not care. It was irrelevant, saidDisclaimer
the Court, that the assailant did not know the victimThis article is provided for informational purposes only
was an officer. In summary, said the Justices, citing aand is not intended to take the place of competent
well-established principle of American law, a tortfeasorlegal advice from an experienced injury attorney in the
"takes his victim as he finds him."state where you live.
This principle is often referred to as the